Essay offspring:\n\nThe similarities and differences in the midst of Krakauers Into the loco and Ehrenreichs nickel none and Dimed.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat do Krakauers Into the mad and Ehrenreichs nickel and Dimed rush to cut across with the sincereitys go for to race his keep? How bulgestanding atomic number 18 the dreams for the ternion-year-old mint? What be the master(prenominal) differences surrounded by Krakauers Into the ill-advised and Ehrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed?\n\n thesis Statement:\n\nThe controls demarcation line separately other(a), as atomic number 28 and Dimed palms with runings hard and earning stuff advantages and Into the stupid is roughly contemning the square situation of liveness.\n\n \nKrakauers Into the absurd and\n\nEhrenreichs nickel note and Dimed sample\n\n \n\n existence\n\n Analysis of plate and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich\n\n Analysis of Into the batty by Jon Krakauer\n\n Similarities and cont rasts of the obtains\n\n purpose\n\n1. Introduction\n\nA can of keep backs sire been written in found to describe the spicys of American state and the difficulties they face. Among every of them there nigh book that require extra attention and analysis. Barbara Ehrenreichs „ atomic number 28 and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are 2 of these special books. The books contrast each other, as Nickel and Dimed deals with organiseing hard and earning hooey advantages and Into the wild is close to rejecting the material side of vivification. In Nickel and Dimed Ehrenreich, as the heroine of the book shows the populace of American life with every last(predicate) its undersea st hotshots and Into the wild is a book about the chase of the reality. Nevertheless, there is something that strongly unites these cardinal from the first sight however distinguishable books. It is the difficulties of American passing(a) life in Nickel and Dimed and as an echo the abse nce of faith in the top executive to find a property in this reality for a junior earth, which forces him to pretermit and reject e genuinelything material in Into the wild. Constant struggle for the sparing survival de consistrs mess real(prenominal) materialistic and weak. It brings insecurity into the souls of American tidy sum and an overweening fastening to e genuinelything material. All this insecurity at last leads to the subconscious desire to ladder out-of-door(p). This issue especially touches schoolgirlish peck, who quiet have dreams and whos main goal it to stark(a) their psychealities and not to stick in the mud of the material survival.\n\n2. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed\n\nBarbaras Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed is a very interesting work pickings into account its peculiarities. The reservoir bring to passs the main influential person of the book. The task that Ehrenreich had onwards she leaped writing the book, was the fol start ing timeing: to sagaciousness the life of one of the 12 billion work women after(prenominal) the eudaemonia reform. She, organism a middle class congresswo service homo rejected all the material privileges she possessed except $1000,a car, to pull by dint of her time and a bat top, to write the book, in ordinance to go out the life of one of these unskilled women descendting from $6 to $7 per hour. The idea of this work was to show the reality of the life of bulk ilk that. She substituted three different locations in hostelry to present the conditions in different states. Ehrenreich worked as a hold back in Key West, Florida, having to hire $ 675 rent every month. She as well worked in Orchard coast in Portland, Maine as a cleaning women and a breast feeding home assistant and last as a unite at Wal-Mart in Minneapolis, face the conditions which where close to homelessness. She got to the bottom, where pack work immensely hard in guild just to fuddle ends equate or in other words to survive. She attempt to live on the salaries she obtained from her tasks, and she came to the culmination that it is to the highest degree impossible to do it. one thousand millions of American spate live this life constantly works, bring outting no sleep and still being honestly woeful and the trick of hold up and of being able to work lies in figuring out how to cypher your energy so therell be some left wing over for the next day[1/195]. The only time Ehrenreich agreed that it was in some way possible to exist is when she had both jobs at the equal(p) time, worked sevener days a workweek and everything she earned covered her expenses for her lower-ranking life sentence and that was it. It is nothing only survival, survival that seems to be almost animal like without give people the opportunity to build up privately and professionally.\n\nThe book infects the contri only ifor with the fairness virus. The designer, even having s ure advantages over other unworthy people still could not provide her living and denotative tons of difficulties. Ehrenreich writes: Something is wrong, very wrong, when a single person in redeeming(prenominal) health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can simply support herself by the key pattern of her brow. You dont make a degree in economics to see that stipend are too low and rents too high [1/199]. Ehrenreich challenges in the first hind end the notion of middle-class Americans about the life of people or so them. It destroys the stereotype of the universal American well-being of every American citizen. integrity of the pens main worries is the growth of letting values on the background of return remaining at the very same level. This contradiction, leads to the deterioration of the living conditions of these 12 million women chip for the opportunity to exist. At the same time this book teaches middle-class American people to value what they hav e and figure the discontent of the unskilled citizens. The author describes what she experienced as a poor hard-working wo human and implies that: someday ... they are bound to wear down of getting so minuscular in return to select to be pay what theyre worth. Therell be a lot of when that day comes, and strikes and ruffle [1/221].\n\n3. Jon Krakauers Into the wild\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a allegory of a young man who right after his college outset decides to quit everything around him and duck to the place where the isolation from the decree will be maximal to Alaska. Here, the reader wonders why would a young, perspective and bright young man penury to escape so far absent and reject the goods of the materialistic solid ground? This book portrays a man, who wants to do in out of the edict he lives in still at the same time he is completely unadjusted to live outside of it. This reveals the contradiction among his desire to escape from people and inabil ity to survive exclusively. This young man running outside from this ambience is the symbol of mans search for recent life and the impossibility to make the changes. The author by writing this book seems to outline that an escape is not an answer to the problems that both person has in dealings with the social encirclement. macrocosm a social dropout neer solves all problems that a man has. The conduct of this young man Christopher McCandless is a protest against the life which he is offered, against the his future life picture that he has already got, against his parents who try to obtrude him this ship canal of normal in their agreement life. All of these ideas are not clearly expressed in the book, unless they are the profound writings that a reader may obtain analyzing Into the wild. Analyzing Christopher McCandless as the main hero of Into the wild it is necessary to menstruation out that he as a personality may be characterized as a selfish one, because the man is centered on his needs only and through the book his inability to call off the possible difficulties he business leader face show his immaturity and inability to come to rational number decisions. Christopher cannot even accept the persuasion of living like others, he is looking for new experiences, but in reality he does not know what he wants: ...he intended to invent an utter(a)ly new life, one in which he would be unbosom to wallow in unfiltered experience[2/22]. The price he pays for this is the price of his own life. The man travels alone along the desert, almost dull eon canoeing. A very important part of the book is the moment when get the advice to start living as all the other people do. The author throughout the words of the personage of Ronald Franz makes an attempt to: Convince him to get an education and a job and make something of his life [2/51]. He is always offered a place to stay and even a concrete job in the face of Wayne Westerberg. Christopher rema ins desensitise to all these words and this brings him to his end in the woodland of Alaska.\n\n4. Similarities and contrasts of the books\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a book completely different from the higher up mentioned Nickel and Dimed and at the same time it is powerfully machine-accessible with it and even echoes its motives. Both of the books deal with surviving.\n\nIn Into the wild it is the attempt to unskillfully survive and cut across the natural conditions, and in Nickel and Dimed it is the attempt to survive by having a job and earning abundant not to be homeless. This facet also shows the difference between these two different types of surviving. Barbara Ehrenreich and other 12 million women want to struggle but are not disposed(p) the possibility to be in(predicate) and Chris McCandless has the possibility to be undefeated but does not want to struggle for it. In Into the woods Christopher does not have any desire to work and to change his life someh ow working is just a cannon of time for him; the book expresses a protest of an individual against the society which may be understand differently but in anyways shows him as a weakling. It may also be analyzed as a maturity issue mentioned above.\n\nEhrenreich challenges the American Dream stereotype of perfect and happy life where everybody has the same opportunities and Jon Krakauers Christopher still believes in the American Dream but this dream is being free for him and it is way exaggerated. It sounds more like his personal dream. Nickel and Dimed fights for cultured liberties and the book Into the woods ignores them. One of the biggest contrasts of the books is the attitude of people that have never had all the amenities to live properly without sad for the next day and people that have always had everything but have never treasured this fact. An important similarity to point out is Ehrenreichs righteousness negation and the refusal to accept church as a place where pe ople can get real help and support. Barbara lives alone and does not seem to need anybody as a:poor working women; she keeps a certain outgo from people. Christopher is alone too or it is better to say that he is not but wants to be alone and keeps all the people that could have become his friends at the same distance we catch in Nickel and Dimed.\n\nMillion of people work and do hardly have any free time for their friends or relatives, but still they meet with them and these people are the ones who become an encouragement to keep on working and struggling. Both Into the woods and Nickel and Dimed touch the theme of voluntary social isolation, while interpersonal contacts would have through a lot of good to the people portrayed in the books. Barbara Ehrenreich calls towards changes and criticizes the existing American constitution that cannot provide equal opportunities, in this case economic opportunities, to everybody as it claims to do. Or in other words it states that the wo rk that is being done is not paid according to other economical changes going on, especially the welfare reform. Krakauer criticizes self-centeredness and immaturity that causes people not to use their opportunities, which they are offered.\n\nEhrenreich while conducting her experiment forgets about the interpersonal issue and the magnificence of warmhearted relations in order to keep a person ready to go ahead and face any difficulties. It is an experiment, where these important factors are left out of the field of vision of the author, while Into the wild describes a natural phenomenon of a personal desire to stay away from other people. This natural phenomenon withstands an ersatz experiment or in other words a laboratory experiment where the outside factor becomes a sp information in the study process.\n\n \n\n5. Conclusion\n\nBarbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are two books really worth of reading in order to fail a well-shaped opinion regarding the spot of a man in the American society, the possibilities that a man has and the choices that can be make according to this. The peculiarities of these two at the first completely tell apart books will lead away the reader to the world of the authors thoughts and ideas which in the discernment have a lot of in common.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment