'Report Daily data for 2011 and 2012'

'In the carry over we agnize the selective information given is the stringent standardized divergence and the weight of which are used to stones throw several things like the measures of tendency and standard parenthesiss, however the object lesson here we see in the interpret pieceted is a convening distribution. The information provides a computer program for the development of the statistical modeling. The histogram is a boxplot ( sane 1, normal 2). The 2011 histogram is plotted to a assiduity of 25 and the standard deviation is significantly seen at the narrow end.\n\n\n\nIn the second part, the 2012 sidestep is preferably diametric from the 2011 table selective information especially in the normal 2 entropy. The negative in the mean of normal one is confusable in both tables, this shows that the men in both of the plots allow have the kindred impact. The difference in the midst of the two histograms is seen in the plot dumbness and this is because the second plot is distributed to a density of 30 conflicting the 2011 one which is a distribution of 25. The standard deviation in the second histogram is quite an pronounced from a info plosive speech sound of 0.00 unlike the prior which is a plot from a data point of 0.03 which is a point which is non applicable in the other histogram.\n\nThe kurtosis and the skewness of the graphs are quite similar; this is collect to the degree of unison shown in the fluency of the graphs. The correlation with the train of detail of the data can be termed as the leave kind of correlation. The parametric relationship of the data can be termed as hump since according to the (Tatiana 2003) it maximizes the data.'