Critical Race Theory and the Rodney King Case Essays -- Recism

Critical Race Theory and the Rodney King caseIn reviewing the term, Canadian Critical Race Theory, I found that the author, carol Aylvard, raises some truly interesting as well as perturbing questions on the nature of racism within the realm of police enforcement. In looking through the lens of the Rodney King case, we are provided with a very specific example of how the issue of unravel was dealt with, or not dealt with within the LAPD and judicial system. To gain a clearer understanding of how race was a study issue in this case but at the same clock not confronted on the front lines, Alyvard highlights several aspects of the case. In the 1991 state trial run of the four police officers accused of beating Rodney King, the prosecution did not point attempt to introduce evidence of racial animus on relegate of the officers. Even though there was video-audio evidence as well as eyewitness testimony to the contrary, they still did not challenge the defenses assertion that no racial epithets had been used by the police officers. As well, the prosecution miss to appeal the decision of the State Court to move the trial from a racially diverse area to the predominantly white area of Simi Valley, where it was inevitable that the officers would be judged by an all-white jury. Furthermore, they also did not challenge the defenses portrayal of Kings injuries as trivial. While it is needless to say that the list goes on and on, it came as no great surprise that the jury acquitted the four LAPD officers. It was also not surprising that riots followed this acquittal. One month after the beating and one course of study after the acquittal, two independent commissions, The McCone Commission and The California State gathering Commission were appoint... ... is possible to implement alternative legal strategies that have their root in recognition instead of avoidance? In looking at additional information displayed on the Internet, there seems to be an even wider slog of issues being developed around the Rodney King Case. How do people of divergent social classes, gender or race fair in the impartiality enforcement system? A few sites as well as the article alluded the O.J. Simpson case. Did this case confirm the importance of race consciousness and show a move toward a better understanding of the role that race plays in law? At any rate, Aylvard argues that the Rodney King case, exposed the significance of race in constitutional and criminal law and the dangers of avoiding it to maintain the myth of seeming blindness. (p. 66). References Carol, A. Aylvard. Canadian Critical Race Theory. Halifax Fernwood, 1999.